United States v. Blair

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Blair

312 F. App'x 581

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Blair. Read the opinion of the Court — 661 F.3d 755 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2009·No. No. 08-8074·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Angela Gwen Blair appeals the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Blair, No. 4:00-cr-00603-CHW-11 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 15, 2008 & entered Sept. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [582]*582presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Angela Gwen Blair appeals the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Blair, No. 4:00-cr-00603-CHW-11 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 15, 2008 & entered Sept. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [582]*582presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED..

United States v. Blair, 312 F. App'x 581 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

312 F. App'x 581 (United States v. Blair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related