United States v. Blair
This text of United States v. Blair (United States v. Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8074
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANGELA GWEN BLAIR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:00-cr-00603-CWH-11)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angela Gwen Blair, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Angela Gwen Blair appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Blair, No.
4:00-cr-00603-CHW-11 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 15, 2008 & entered
Sept. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Blair, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-blair-ca4-2009.