United States v. Bell

Seventh Circuit

United States v. Bell

605 F.3d 1060, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10197, 2010 WL 1980096

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 16, 2010

DocketNo. 09-2555

StatusPublished

This text of 605 F.3d 1060 (United States v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bell, 605 F.3d 1060, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10197, 2010 WL 1980096 (7th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The government has filed a petition for rehearing seeking affirmance of this case on the basis of application note 4(B) to Guideline Section 1B1.1.

This application note was not cited by the government in its briefing of this case, nor did the government cite any case applying application note 4(B) nor make an argument based on this application note. Therefore, the argument has been forfeited and the matter does not qualify for possible treatment as plain error.

We express no opinion on the meaning and effect of application note 4(B) in the present circumstances.

As no judge of the panel has voted to grant it, the petition for rehearing is Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The government has filed a petition for rehearing seeking affirmance of this case on the basis of application note 4(B) to Guideline Section 1B1.1.

This application note was not cited by the government in its briefing of this case, nor did the government cite any case applying application note 4(B) nor make an argument based on this application note. Therefore, the argument has been forfeited and the matter does not qualify for possible treatment as plain error.

We express no opinion on the meaning and effect of application note 4(B) in the present circumstances.

As no judge of the panel has voted to grant it, the petition for rehearing is Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

605 F.3d 1060, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10197, 2010 WL 1980096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bell-ca7-2010.