United States v. Bell

605 F.3d 1060, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10197, 2010 WL 1980096
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bell. Read the opinion of the Court — 624 F.3d 803
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided March 16, 2010·No. No. 09-2555·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The government has filed a petition for rehearing seeking affirmance of this case on the basis of application note 4(B) to Guideline Section 1B1.1.

This application note was not cited by the government in its briefing of this case, nor did the government cite any case applying application note 4(B) nor make an argument based on this application note. Therefore, the argument has been forfeited and the matter does not qualify for possible treatment as plain error.

We express no opinion on the meaning and effect of application note 4(B) in the present circumstances.

As no judge of the panel has voted to grant it, the petition for rehearing is Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bell, 605 F.3d 1060, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10197, 2010 WL 1980096 (7th Cir. 2010).

605 F.3d 1060 (United States v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.