United States v. Bankers Trust Co.

419 U.S. 883, 95 S. Ct. 147, 42 L. Ed. 2d 122, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 2877

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 15, 1974

DocketNo. 73-1672

StatusPublished

Cited by125 cases

This text of 419 U.S. 883 (United States v. Bankers Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bankers Trust Co., 419 U.S. 883, 95 S. Ct. 147, 42 L. Ed. 2d 122, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 2877 (1974).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion to substitute Bank of New York et al. in place of Morgan Guaranty-Trust Company of New York as parties respondent granted. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LLC v. Cendant Corp.

161 F. Supp. 2d 355 (D. New Jersey, 2001)

In Re Cendant Corp. Securities Litigation

166 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D. New Jersey, 2001)

Hudson United Bank v. Chase Manhattan Bank of Connecticut, N.A.

43 F.3d 843 (Third Circuit, 1994)

Canale v. Yegen

789 F. Supp. 147 (D. New Jersey, 1992)

Urbach v. Sayles

779 F. Supp. 351 (D. New Jersey, 1991)

48 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1010, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,460 Richard Sperling, Frederick Hemsley and Joseph Zelauskas, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc., a New Jersey Corporation

862 F.2d 439 (Third Circuit, 1989)

Borden, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

855 F.2d 254 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)

United States of America, Cross-Appellant in No. 87-1777 v. Marcus Spears and Doris E. Spears. Appeal of Doris Spears, in No. 87-1735

859 F.2d 284 (Third Circuit, 1988)

In Re Chicago, Missouri & Western Railway Co.

90 B.R. 344 (N.D. Illinois, 1988)

In Re Data Access Systems Securities Litigation. Appeal of Tolins & Lowenfels & Roger A. Tolins. Appeal of I. Kahlowsky and Co. And Peter Cunicelli

843 F.2d 1537 (Third Circuit, 1988)

United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

824 F.2d 417 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)

Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

824 F.2d 981 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)

John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor Company

807 F.2d 1000 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)

Cletis Meredith Miller v. William Bolger, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service and the United States of America

802 F.2d 660 (Third Circuit, 1986)

Office of Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Process Gas Consumers Group, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Consumer Advocate for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Washington Gas Light Company, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Intervenors. Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Process Gas Consumers Group, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Washington Gas Light Company, Interstate Gas Association of America, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Intervenors. Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington Gas Light Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Process Gas Consumers Group, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Citizen/labor Energy Coalition v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Baltimore Gas & Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Process Gas Consumers Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Washington Gas Light Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Pennsylvania Department of Commerce, Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity, American Iron and Steel Institute, Georgia Industrial Group, Intervenors. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Process Gas Consumers Group, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ohio Office of Consumers' Counsel, Washington Gas Light Company, Associated Gas Distributors, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and Union Light, Heat & Power Company, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors

783 F.2d 206 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)

National Juice Products Ass'n v. United States

628 F. Supp. 978 (Court of International Trade, 1986)

Max Daetwyler Corp., a New York Corporation v. R. Meyer, a West German Corporation. Appeal of Rolf Meyer

762 F.2d 290 (Third Circuit, 1985)

Julius Ducre v. The Executive Officers of Halter Marine, Inc.

752 F.2d 976 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)

In the Matter of CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Debtor. Appeal of FARMERS COOPERATIVE ELEVATOR, RAKE, IOWA

753 F.2d 56 (Seventh Circuit, 1985)

Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.

726 F.2d 930 (Second Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 U.S. 883, 95 S. Ct. 147, 42 L. Ed. 2d 122, 1974 U.S. LEXIS 2877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bankers-trust-co-scotus-1974.