United States v. Baker

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 10, 2009·No. 08-7641·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7641

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FREDERICK ROOSEVELT BAKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00097-RLW-1)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: March 10, 2009

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Roosevelt Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Frederick Roosevelt Baker appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Baker, No. 3:02-cr-00097-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 1, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Baker, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Baker (United States v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related