United States v. Baker

289 F. App'x 607

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Marcellus Baker appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp.2008). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Baker, Nos. 8:94-cr-00361-PJM-l; 8:08-cv-01102-PJM-l (D.Md. filed May 1, 2008 and entered May 2, 2008; May 9, 2008). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

* To the extent that Baker seeks to raise his claims by way of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, the district court properly noted that he must first obtain authorization from this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000).