United States v. Baker
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8149
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LARRY BAKER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:02-cr-00033-RGD-JEB-1)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Larry Baker appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Baker, No. 2:02-cr-
00033-RGD-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 17, 2008 & entered
Sept. 19, 2008). We deny Baker’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Baker (United States v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.