United States v. Bailey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6561

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM M. JACKSON BAILEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (5:98-cr-30001-JPJ-2)

Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 8, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Jackson Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Ray Burton Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William M. Jackson Bailey appeals from the district

court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000), and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Bailey, No. 5:98-cr-30001-

JPJ-2 (W.D. Va. filed Mar. 13, 2008 & entered Mar. 14, 2008; Apr.

14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -