United States v. Bailey
Opinion
William M. Jackson Bailey appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bailey, No. 5:98-cr-30001-JPJ-2, 2008 WL 723753 (W.D.Va. filed Mar. 13, 2008 & entered Mar. 14, 2008; Apr. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
286 F. App'x 106 (United States v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.