United States v. Audett

529 F.2d 569
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 26, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1503
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 529 F.2d 569 (United States v. Audett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Audett, 529 F.2d 569 (9th Cir. 1976).

Opinion

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Before CHAMBERS and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and WONG,* District Judge.

The court properly instructed the jury on the government’s burden of proof. It also properly instructed the jury on appellant’s alibi, stating that if there were reasonable doubt whether appellant was present at the time and place of the alleged offense, the jury must acquit him. These instructions completely covered appellant’s theory and we find no error in the district court’s refusal to give the specific instruction that appellant requested. United States v. Noah, 475 F.2d 688, 697 (9th Cir. 1973). Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Sandoval-Gonzalez
642 F.3d 717 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
The United States v. James Henry Audett
529 F.2d 569 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 F.2d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-audett-ca9-1976.