The United States v. James Henry Audett

529 F.2d 569
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 26, 1976
Docket75--1503
StatusPublished

This text of 529 F.2d 569 (The United States v. James Henry Audett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The United States v. James Henry Audett, 529 F.2d 569 (9th Cir. 1976).

Opinion

529 F.2d 569

The UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Henry AUDETT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 75--1503.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 26, 1976.

Glenn A. Stanberry, Jr., of Davidson & Davidson, Foster City, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Harry J. McCarthy, Asst. U.S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Before CHAMBERS and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and WONG,* District Judge.

The court properly instructed the jury on the government's burden of proof. It also properly instructed the jury on appellant's alibi, stating that if there were reasonable doubt whether appellant was present at the time and place of the alleged offense, the jury must acquit him. These instructions completely covered appellant's theory and we find no error in the district court's refusal to give the specific instruction that appellant requested. United States v. Noah, 475 F.2d 688, 697 (9th Cir. 1973).

Affirmed.

*

The Honorable Dick Yin Wong, United States District Judge, for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Noah
475 F.2d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Audett
529 F.2d 569 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 F.2d 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-united-states-v-james-henry-audett-ca9-1976.