United States v. Arrington

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8086

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARQUIS D. ARRINGTON,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00255-JRS)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 28, 2010

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marquis D. Arrington, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Lawrence Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marquis D. Arrington appeals the district court’s

order denying his second 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion

for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Arrington, No.

3:06-cr-00255-JRS (E.D. Va. Oct. 27, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED