United States v. Arrington

473 F. App'x 275
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6022
StatusPublished

This text of 473 F. App'x 275 (United States v. Arrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Arrington, 473 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jeteime Vaun Arrington appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction based on the Fair Sentencing Act, Pub.L. No. 111-220, 124 Stat. 2872 (“FSA”), and Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, as well as its order denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record demonstrates that neither the FSA nor Amendment 750 alters Arrington’s Guidelines range on his narcotics conviction. See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 248 (4th Cir.2011); United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 235-36 (4th Cir.2009). We also conclude that the district court lacked authority to entertain Arrington’s motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bullard
645 F.3d 237 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Hood
556 F.3d 226 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F. App'x 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arrington-ca4-2012.