United States v. Anderson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 161 F. App'x 253
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 22, 2008·No. 08-6784·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6784

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLEAMON ANDERSON, a/k/a Carmel,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:94-cr-00163-RBS-11)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 22, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cleamon Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Cleamon Anderson appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A.

§ 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Anderson,

No. 2:94-cr-00163-RBS-11 (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Anderson, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Anderson (United States v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related