United States v. Anderson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 F. App'x 211
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 8, 2006·No. 06-7238·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7238

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DON BENNY ANDERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 06-7433

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris and Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judges. (1:83-cr-00159-AVB)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 8, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Don Benny Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Don Benny Anderson appeals

the district court’s orders denying his motions filed under Fed. R.

Crim. P. 35(a) (applicable to offenses committed before November 1,

1987). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief.

United States v. Anderson, No. 1:83-cr-00159-AVB (E.D. Va. June 28,

2006; August 2, 2006). We deny Anderson’s motion for preparation

of a transcript at government expense, deny as moot his motion to

expedite, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Anderson, (4th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Anderson (United States v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.