United States v. Anderson

291 F. App'x 526

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lynval Kerris Anderson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Anderson, No. 2:98-cr-00143-HCM-1 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 25, 2008; entered Apr. 29, 2008). We deny Anderson’s motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.