United States v. Ameline
401 F.3d 1007, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4138, 2005 WL 612710
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2005·No. 02-30326·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or *1008 any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Ameline, 401 F.3d 1007, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4138, 2005 WL 612710 (9th Cir. 2005).
401 F.3d 1007 (United States v. Ameline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Barken
Ninth Circuit, 2005
United States v. Gary Donald Barken
412 F.3d 1131 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Ameline
Ninth Circuit, 2005
United States v. Coles, Terence
403 F.3d 764 (D.C. Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Webb
Sixth Circuit, 2005
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. ALFRED ARNOLD AMELINE, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT
401 F.3d 1007 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)