United States v. Allison

390 F. App'x 277
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Allison. Read the opinion of the Court — 398 F. App'x 862
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 10, 2010·No. No. 09-6974·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Dwayne Allison appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based upon the amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Allison, No. 1:04-cr-00093-gmw-pms-1 (W.D.Va. Apr. 7, 2009). We deny the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and' legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Allison, 390 F. App'x 277 (4th Cir. 2010).

390 F. App'x 277 (United States v. Allison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related