United States v. Allison

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Allison. Read the opinion of the Court — 398 F. App'x 862
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 10, 2010·No. 09-6974A·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6974

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHARD DWAYNE ALLISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (1:04-cr-00093-gmw-pms-1)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 10, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Dwayne Allison, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Dwayne Allison appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based

upon the amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Allison, No. 1:04-cr-00093-gmw-pms-1

(W.D. Va. Apr. 7, 2009). We deny the Government’s motion to

dismiss the appeal and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Allison, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Allison (United States v. Allison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related