United States v. Allen

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 422 F. App'x 192
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2010·No. 10-6986·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6986

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JASPER TUJUIAN ALLEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00299-BO-1)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 22, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jasper Tujuian Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jasper Tujuian Allen seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Allen, No. 5:03-cr-00299-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. filed May 28, 2010,

entered June 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Allen, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Allen (United States v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related