United States v. Allen

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 422 F. App'x 192
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 16, 2010·No. 10-6319·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6319

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JASPER TUJUIAN ALLEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00299-BO-1)

Submitted: June 29, 2010 Decided: July 16, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jasper Tujuian Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jasper Tujuian Allen appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) (2006) motion to

reopen his sentence and compel the Government to file a

substantial assistance motion pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Allen, No. 5:03-cr-00299-BO-1 (E.D.N.C.

Feb. 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Allen, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Allen (United States v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related