United States v. Agop Kismetoglu

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Agop Kismetoglu

468 F.2d 1386

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 5, 1973

Docket72-1413

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 468 F.2d 1386 (United States v. Agop Kismetoglu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Agop Kismetoglu, 468 F.2d 1386 (9th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The question presented by this appeal is whether the district court may, in a criminal proceeding, enjoin the United States from filing a forfeiture action for alleged violation of the customs laws.

We hold this court’s opinion in United States v. One 1967 Cadillac El Dorado, 453 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1971) requires that this question be answered in the affirmative.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The question presented by this appeal is whether the district court may, in a criminal proceeding, enjoin the United States from filing a forfeiture action for alleged violation of the customs laws.

We hold this court’s opinion in United States v. One 1967 Cadillac El Dorado, 453 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1971) requires that this question be answered in the affirmative.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

468 F.2d 1386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-agop-kismetoglu-ca9-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack