United States v. Agop Kismetoglu

468 F.2d 1386

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 5, 1973·No. 72-1413·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The question presented by this appeal is whether the district court may, in a criminal proceeding, enjoin the United States from filing a forfeiture action for alleged violation of the customs laws.

We hold this court’s opinion in United States v. One 1967 Cadillac El Dorado, 453 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1971) requires that this question be answered in the affirmative.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The question presented by this appeal is whether the district court may, in a criminal proceeding, enjoin the United States from filing a forfeiture action for alleged violation of the customs laws.

We hold this court’s opinion in United States v. One 1967 Cadillac El Dorado, 453 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1971) requires that this question be answered in the affirmative.

Judgment affirmed.

United States v. Agop Kismetoglu, 468 F.2d 1386 (9th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

468 F.2d 1386 (United States v. Agop Kismetoglu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Daryl Standlee v. B. J. Rhay

557 F.2d 1303 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)

Opinion

Related