United States v. Adams Construction Co.

20 F. App'x 253
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 2001
Docket01-1566
StatusUnpublished

This text of 20 F. App'x 253 (United States v. Adams Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Adams Construction Co., 20 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tri-M Electrical Contractors, Incorporated (“Tri-M”) appeals a district court order granting partial summary judgment to Adams Construction Company Incorporated and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company dismissing Tri-M’s claim under the Miller Act, 40 U .S.C.A. §§ 270a et seq. (West 1986 & Supp.2001), and dismissing the remaining claims without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s oral findings and find no error. See United States f/u/b Interstate Mechanical Construction v. International Fidelity Ins. Co., 200 F.3d 456 (6th Cir.2000); United States f/u/b Noland Co. v. Andrews, 406 F.2d 790 (4th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States f/u/b v. Adams Constr. Co., No. CA-99-799-9-8 (D.S.C. filed Mar. 26, 2001; entered Mar. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 F. App'x 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-adams-construction-co-ca4-2001.