United States v. 1,629.6 ACRES OF LAND, ETC., STATE OF DEL.

335 F. Supp. 255, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10524
CourtDistrict Court, D. Delaware
DecidedDecember 3, 1971
DocketCiv. A. 3532
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 335 F. Supp. 255 (United States v. 1,629.6 ACRES OF LAND, ETC., STATE OF DEL.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. 1,629.6 ACRES OF LAND, ETC., STATE OF DEL., 335 F. Supp. 255, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10524 (D. Del. 1971).

Opinion

OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.

The United States of America (Government) commenced this suit in eminent domain to condemn 1,629.6 acres of land in Sussex County. The initial complaint named as defendant The Island Farm, Inc. (Island Farm), and was subsequently amended to include as an additional defendant Jennie H. J. Lay-ton (Layton).

Since the Government has possession of the land, the remaining consideration is to establish just compensation. The Court previously granted the motion of Island Farm requesting that a commission be appointed to determine the value of the condemned land. 1

Prior to the designation of the commission and pursuant to an evidenced conflict concerning title to a segment of the condemned land, the Government joined Layton as a party defendant. The instant decision involves the determination of the ownership of the disputed portions of land to which both defendants claim title. In addition, the Court must resolve the question of the ownership of a certain area of land adjacent to, but outside of the land condemned in this proceeding. The Court’s decision with respect to the title of land within the taking will determine to whom the monetary award is payable; however, any resolution of the ownership of land outside of the condemned parcel will be for the sole purpose of establishing just compensation for the land taken. 2

Prior to the taking, in 1968, Layton and Island Farm were adjoining land owners separated in major part by the Deep Hole Creek. 3 Layton’s property bordered on the Delaware Bay and consisted predominately of barrier beach land, sand and marsh. In the area pertinent to this dispute, Island Farm’s acreage was primarily marsh and fast land.

The title dispute between Layton and Island Farm involves the land in the area of a small portion of the eastern boundary at the southeastern corner of *260 Parcel D (Tract 79c) of the condemned land. When defining the land to be taken, the Government utilized the Island Farm’s deed description except for the area of land subject of this title dispute. Both of the boundaries immediately north and south of the disputed portion, Deep Hole Creek and Broadkill River respectively, coincide with the deed description of Island Farm’s original title for all purposes pertinent to this opinion. However, for a distance of 37.4 chains (approximately 2,468 feet) running generally north-south, the Government arbitrarily established a straight line as the eastern boundary of that segment. The boundary was so delineated because in that area, the initial boundary as described in the Island Farm deed, was not readily ascertainable. 4 Subsequent to the Government’s filing of the complaint herein the defendants raised their conflicting contentions with regard to title to the condemned lands and the appropriate allocation of the monetary award. The dispute evinced the importance of the delimitation of the exact location of the Island Farm-Layton boundary and its relationship to the Government’s arbitrary designation and made necessary the delineation of the Island Farm and Layton interests in the property prior to condemnation.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The land condemned by the Government is now part of the Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge and lies immediately north of the Broadkill River in Broadkill Hundred, Sussex County, Delaware.

Prior to 1907, all of the property pertinent to the resolution of this title dispute was owned by George and Della Hall. It was comprised of two separate parcels:

1. A single piece of barrier beach land, starting below the southern terminus of Deep Hole Creek at its junction with the Broadkill River and extending to the then existing entrance of the Deep Hole Creek in the Delaware Bay approximately two miles to the north (what is presently primarily Layton’s land), and

2. A parcel of marsh and fast land to the west of the barrier beach and separated from it along its entire length by the Deep Hole Creek (Island Farm’s property). Running north from its confluence with the Broadkill River, Deep Hole Creek was then a navigable waterway and the sole means of access between the Broadkill River and the Delaware Bay. 5

In 1907, the Government purchased 5.8 acres of barrier beach land from the Halls for purposes of constructing an inlet and jetty to stabilize the navigational channel between the Broadkill River and the Bay. 6 The 5.8 acres lay *261 approximately one-quarter mile north of the Broadkill River — Deep Hole Creek juncture. On this acreage, the Government constructed a jetty which curved from north-east to south-west from approximately 250 feet into the Delaware Bay across the barrier beach and the Deep Hole Creek to the eastern edge of the marsh or fast land. 7 The Government, also, dredged a channel along the southern, concave edge of the jetty, thereby creating an inlet providing a navigable waterway for access to the Deep Hole Creek and the Broadkill River. 8

In 1921, Della Hall sold the remaining barrier beach land to Layton. The conveyance consisted of two parcels, one immediately north of the Government’s 5.8 acres and one immediately to the south. The deed purports to convey parcels bounded immediately on their northern or southern edge by the 5.8 acre parcel owned by the Government. However, at the time of the transfer some of the southern parcel had been eroded away by the Broadkill Inlet. 9

In September, 1936, the marsh or fast land which was west of the Deep Hole Creek was deeded to H. Carlton Draper (Draper) who several months thereafter transferred title to Island Farm. 10 Although the deed described the entire eastern boundary as the channel of Deep Hole Creek, in the area south of the jetty a substantial portion of the Deep Hole Creek had been obliterated by the inlet and accompanying channel to Broadkill River. 11 A portion of Island Farm’s land bordered on the Broadkill Inlet and was not separated from the Delaware Bay by any barrier beach land. 12

Shortly after Draper had purchased his property, the Government constructed a second inlet, Roosevelt Inlet, to provide a navigable channel to the Broadkill River. Built in 1938, Roosevelt Inlet lay several miles south of Lewes Inlet and its confluence with the Broadkill River and became the principal channel between the Delaware Bay and the Broad-kill River. Broadkill Inlet rapidly assumed a subordinate role as a navigational waterway and eventually began to shoal up. In 1953, the Government authorized the abandonment of the Broad-kill Inlet for navigational purposes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scureman v. Judge
747 A.2d 62 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1999)
Kim-Go v. J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc.
484 N.W.2d 118 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
Rayne v. Coulbourne
500 A.2d 665 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1985)
Tennant v. Recreation Development Corp.
249 N.W.2d 348 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Pearson
315 So. 2d 98 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
United States v. 1,629.6 Acres of Land
503 F.2d 764 (Third Circuit, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
335 F. Supp. 255, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-16296-acres-of-land-etc-state-of-del-ded-1971.