United States of America, Ex Rel., Harold R. Fine v. Chevron Usa, Inc. Bechtel Petroleum Operations, Inc. Williams Brothers Engineering Company, United States of America, Ex Rel., Harold R. Fine v. University of California, and the Board of Regents of the University of California

60 F.3d 525, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4536, 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1312, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14577
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 8, 1995
Docket93-15012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 F.3d 525 (United States of America, Ex Rel., Harold R. Fine v. Chevron Usa, Inc. Bechtel Petroleum Operations, Inc. Williams Brothers Engineering Company, United States of America, Ex Rel., Harold R. Fine v. University of California, and the Board of Regents of the University of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America, Ex Rel., Harold R. Fine v. Chevron Usa, Inc. Bechtel Petroleum Operations, Inc. Williams Brothers Engineering Company, United States of America, Ex Rel., Harold R. Fine v. University of California, and the Board of Regents of the University of California, 60 F.3d 525, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4536, 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1312, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14577 (9th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

60 F.3d 525

10 IER Cases 1312

UNITED STATES of America, ex rel., Plaintiff,
Harold R. FINE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHEVRON USA, INC.; Bechtel Petroleum Operations, Inc.;
Williams Brothers Engineering Company,
Defendants-Appellees.
UNITED STATES of America, ex rel., Plaintiff,
Harold R. FINE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, and the Board of Regents of the
University of California, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 93-15012, 93-15728.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

June 8, 1995.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge.

Prior Report: 39 F.3d 957.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F.3d 525, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4536, 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1312, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-harold-r-fine-v-chevron-usa-inc-ca9-1995.