United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Evans

158 S.E.2d 243, 223 Ga. 789, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 697
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1967
Docket24275
StatusPublished
Cited by37 cases

This text of 158 S.E.2d 243 (United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Evans, 158 S.E.2d 243, 223 Ga. 789, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 697 (Ga. 1967).

Opinions

Frankum, Justice.

This case is before this court upon the grant of the writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals. See U. S. Fidelity &c. Co. v. Evans, 116 Ga. App. 93 (156 SE2d 809). Upon consideration of the question presented we are of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeals and the opinion concurred in by the majority of the judges of that court are correct and should be affirmed. An examination of the record shows that upon the appeal by the defendant on behalf of its insured in the original suit by Williams against the insured, Evans, the only questions presented to the -Court of Appeals were no more than mere elaborations of the general grounds of a motion for - a new trial. A mere cursory examination of the evidence adduced on the trial of that case reveals that there was ample evidence to support the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff on all points raised in the appeal. Under such circumstances, how could anyone have reasonably expected a reversal of the judgment in the face of the fundamental rule that, in the absence of some error of law appearing, the appellate courts will not reverse a jury verdict supported by any evidence? The finding that the defendant acted in bad faith was authorized, and the Court of Appeals did not err in affirming the judgment of the trial court for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Almand, P. J., who dissents. [790]*790Henry A. Stewart, Sr., for appellants. James I. Parker, for appellee. Max F. Goldstein, for party at interest not party to record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Camacho v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
188 F. Supp. 3d 1331 (N.D. Georgia, 2016)
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. v. Xl Specialty Insurance Company
771 S.E.2d 864 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2015)
Camacho v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
13 F. Supp. 3d 1343 (N.D. Georgia, 2014)
Butler v. First Acceptance Ins. Co., Inc.
652 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (N.D. Georgia, 2009)
Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. Brightman
580 S.E.2d 519 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Thomas v. Atlanta Casualty Co.
558 S.E.2d 432 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
Jefferson Ins. Co. of New York v. Dunn
482 S.E.2d 383 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Southern General Insurance v. Holt
416 S.E.2d 274 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1992)
Southern General Insurance v. Holt
409 S.E.2d 852 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Great American Insurance v. International Insurance
753 F. Supp. 357 (M.D. Georgia, 1990)
Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Keeley
447 N.W.2d 691 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1989)
Leader National Insurance v. Smith
339 S.E.2d 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
McCall v. Allstate Insurance
310 S.E.2d 513 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1984)
United States Life Insurance v. Huckaby
250 S.E.2d 833 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 S.E.2d 243, 223 Ga. 789, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-fidelity-guaranty-company-v-evans-ga-1967.