United States Ex Rel. Spinella v. Savoretti, District Director of United States Immigration and Naturalization Service Dist. No. 6, Miami, Fla

201 F.2d 364
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 1953
Docket14108
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 201 F.2d 364 (United States Ex Rel. Spinella v. Savoretti, District Director of United States Immigration and Naturalization Service Dist. No. 6, Miami, Fla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Ex Rel. Spinella v. Savoretti, District Director of United States Immigration and Naturalization Service Dist. No. 6, Miami, Fla, 201 F.2d 364 (5th Cir. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

His petition, for writ of habeas corpus for release under bond pending deportation proceedings, denied below, the petitioner appealed to this court.

After the cause had been assigned for hearing but before the hearing date, appellee filed in the cause a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot, supporting it with a certified copy of the deportation proceedings showing that appellant had been ordered deported and the deportation order had become final.

Not at. all disputing that appellant had been ordered deported and the Board of Immigration Appeals had dismissed the appeal from that order, appellant insists that the order is not final because, (1) appellant still has a right to file, and has filed, a motion to reconsider or reopen his case, and (2) if he should fail in said motion, he still has a right to seek, by habeas corpus, judicial relief therefrom.

We cannot agree with appellant. We think it clear: that appellant has exhausted his administrative remedies; that the deportation order is now final; that the question raised by his appeal, whether the court erred in denying him bond pending the deportation proceedings, has become moot; 1 and that the appeal should be dismissed.

Dismissed, as moot.

1

. U. S. ex rel. Eisler v. District Director of Immigration, 2 Cir., 162 F.2d 408; Savage v. White, 56 App.D.C. 365, 14 F. 2d 352; Cover v. Schwartz, 2 Cir., 133 F.2d 541.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivas v. Garland
W.D. New York, 2022
Omaliki v. Barr
W.D. New York, 2020
Shiqi Xue v. Holder
354 F. App'x 596 (Second Circuit, 2009)
Okpoju v. Ridge
115 F. App'x 302 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
Wang v. Ashcroft
320 F.3d 130 (Second Circuit, 2003)
Mu-Xing Wang v. Ashcroft
320 F.3d 130 (Second Circuit, 2003)
Mazen Al Najjar v. John Ashcroft
273 F.3d 1330 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
Spinella v. Esperdy
188 F. Supp. 535 (S.D. New York, 1960)
Petition for Naturalization of Marko Terzich
256 F.2d 197 (Third Circuit, 1958)
In re Naturalization of Terzich
153 F. Supp. 651 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1957)
Banks v. United States
204 F.2d 583 (Fifth Circuit, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 F.2d 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-spinella-v-savoretti-district-director-of-united-ca5-1953.