Banks v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Banks v. United States

204 F.2d 583, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2475

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 19, 1953·No. 14468·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the petition for naturalization is affirmed because there is outstanding against the petitioner a final finding of deportability, 8 U.S.C.A. § 729(c), 1 Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.S. 229, 73 S.Ct. 603; Spinella v. Savoretti, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 364; United States ex rel. Jankowski v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 186 F.2d 580.

Affirmed.

1

. See. 329(c) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended by Sec. 27 of the Internal Security Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 1015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the petition for naturalization is affirmed because there is outstanding against the petitioner a final finding of deportability, 8 U.S.C.A. § 729(c), 1 Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.S. 229, 73 S.Ct. 603; Spinella v. Savoretti, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 364; United States ex rel. Jankowski v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 186 F.2d 580.

Affirmed.

1

. See. 329(c) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended by Sec. 27 of the Internal Security Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 1015.

Banks v. United States, 204 F.2d 583, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2475 (5th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

204 F.2d 583 (Banks v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related