Banks v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Banks v. United States

204 F.2d 583, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2475

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 19, 1953

Docket14468

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 204 F.2d 583 (Banks v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banks v. United States, 204 F.2d 583, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2475 (5th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the petition for naturalization is affirmed because there is outstanding against the petitioner a final finding of deportability, 8 U.S.C.A. § 729(c), 1 Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.S. 229, 73 S.Ct. 603; Spinella v. Savoretti, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 364; United States ex rel. Jankowski v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 186 F.2d 580.

Affirmed.

1

. See. 329(c) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended by Sec. 27 of the Internal Security Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 1015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the petition for naturalization is affirmed because there is outstanding against the petitioner a final finding of deportability, 8 U.S.C.A. § 729(c), 1 Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U.S. 229, 73 S.Ct. 603; Spinella v. Savoretti, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 364; United States ex rel. Jankowski v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 186 F.2d 580.

Affirmed.

1

. See. 329(c) of the Nationality Act of 1940, as amended by Sec. 27 of the Internal Security Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 1015.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 F.2d 583, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-united-states-ca5-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack