Harry Carlisle v. Herman R. Landon, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service

219 F.2d 439
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 15, 1955
Docket13878_1
StatusPublished

This text of 219 F.2d 439 (Harry Carlisle v. Herman R. Landon, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harry Carlisle v. Herman R. Landon, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, 219 F.2d 439 (9th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the petitioner, Harry Carlisle, in habeas corpus, from a judgment of the United States District Court which denied him his liberty pending final determination of proceedings before the immigration authorities to deport him. 1 In the course of the hearings referred to, Mr. Justice Douglas of the United States Supreme Court ordered petitioner’s release, pending decision of this court upon the appeal, upon his giving a bail bond in the sum of $5,000. Petitioner-appellant furnished bond and he was released and he has been at large ever since.

The deportation proceedings have now been completed and petitioner-appellant has finally been ordered deported.

We therefore hold that this appeal is moot. United States ex rel. Spinella v. Savoretti, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 364, certiorari denied 345 U.S. 975, 73 S.Ct. 1124, 97 L.Ed. 1390.

Appeal dismissed.

1

. E'er derivative history of the Carlisle case, see: Carlson v. Landon, 9 Cir., 186 F.2d 183; Stevenson, Hyun, and Carlisle v. Landon, 9 Cir., 186 F.2d 190 (191 for Carlisle) ; Carlson, Stevenson, Hyun and Carlisle v. Landon, 9 Cir., 187 F.2d 991, 1000;

Action by the U. S. Supreme Court on 187 E\2d 991; 1000:

Bail granted, 341 U.S. 918, 71 S.Ct. 744, 95 L.Ed. 1353;

Certiorari granted, 342 U.S. 807, 72 S.Ct. 26, 96 L.Ed. 610;

9th Circuit affirmed, 342 U.S. 524, 72 S.Ct. 525, 96 L.Ed. 547;

Rehearing denied, 343 U.S. 988, 72 S.Ct. 1069, 96 L.Ed. 1375.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 F.2d 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-carlisle-v-herman-r-landon-district-director-of-immigration-and-ca9-1955.