United Farm Workers v. Perdue

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 26, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-01452·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 UNITED FARM WORKERS, et al., ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01452 DAD JLT ) 12 Plaintiffs, ) ORDER CLOSING THE CASE ) 13 v. ) (Doc. 56)

14 SONNY PERDUE, et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 )

17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. 56) The 18 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further 19 order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation, it 20 “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 21 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated: March 26, 2021 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United Farm Workers v. Perdue, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

United Farm Workers v. Perdue (United Farm Workers v. Perdue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)