Union Lumber Co. v. Simon

89 P. 1077, 150 Cal. 751, 1907 Cal. LEXIS 582
California Supreme Court·Decided April 2, 1907·No. S.F. No. 4126.·Published·Cited by 29 cases

Opinions

This case was decided in the district court of appeal for the first district, within the sixty days next preceding April 18, 1906, and found its way to this court by reason of the general order made April 23, 1906, transferring all causes in which applications for rehearing were then pending. Since the decision by the court of appeal, this court has decided, in Builders'Supply Depot v. O'Connor, ante, p. 265, [88 P. 982], that our statutory provision as to the allowance of attorney's fees in this class of actions is unconstitutional and void. It follows that, in so far as the judgment allows attorney's fees, it is erroneous. We do not agree to that part of the opinion of Justice Harrison intimating that a notice of lien sufficient as to the owner may be void as to third persons without knowledge of the extrinsic facts. In our opinion the notice of lien, as a whole, contains sufficient matter of description to make it good in that respect as to all persons. In all other respects we find that the opinion of the district court of appeal is a correct exposition of the law applicable, and to that extent the same is adopted as the opinion of this court.

The judgment is modified by striking therefrom all allowances for attorney's fees, and, as so modified, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Lumber Co. v. Simon, 89 P. 1077, 150 Cal. 751, 1907 Cal. LEXIS 582 (Cal. 1907).

89 P. 1077 (Union Lumber Co. v. Simon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Interiors by K.C. v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/2
California Court of Appeal, 2013
Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.
979 P.2d 627 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1999)
Howard A. Deason & Co. v. Costa Tierra Ltd.
2 Cal. App. 3d 742 (California Court of Appeal, 1969)
Buchwald v. Superior Court of S.F.
254 Cal. App. 2d 347 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
N. C. Roberts Co. v. Topaz Transformer Products, Inc.
239 Cal. App. 2d 801 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)
Borello v. Eichler Homes, Inc.
221 Cal. App. 2d 487 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
Turnboo v. Keele
383 P.2d 591 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1963)
Credit Bureau of San Diego, Inc. v. Williams
315 P.2d 355 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Wolfson v. Beatty
257 P.2d 1017 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)
Lewis & Queen v. S. Edmondson & Sons
248 P.2d 973 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
Clinton v. Hogan
183 P.2d 50 (California Court of Appeal, 1947)
Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Ford
148 P.2d 689 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
Bechtold v. Bishop & Co., Inc.
105 P.2d 984 (California Supreme Court, 1940)
Ackerson v. Albuquerque Lumber Co.
29 P.2d 714 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1934)
Manufacturers' Finance Corp. v. Pacific Wholesale Radio, Inc.
19 P.2d 1013 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Leibowitz v. Berry
299 P. 779 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Asnon v. Foley
288 P. 792 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
Stanton v. Superior Court of California
261 P. 1001 (California Supreme Court, 1927)
Ogram v. Welchoff
180 P. 631 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Planing Mill Co. v. Roman Cath. Bishop
176 P. 166 (California Supreme Court, 1918)