Typhoon Fan Co. v. Pilsbury
This text of 118 So. 70 (Typhoon Fan Co. v. Pilsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
On Motion to Dismiss.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment sustaining a. plea of res adjudicata, and defendant has moved to dismiss, the appeal. The grounds urged for dismissing the appeal may be summed up as follows: (1) That the appeal is frivolous; (2) that it is taken solely for the purpose of harassing defendant and delaying the execution of - a final judgment, rendered by this court, in a suit between the same parties (162 La. 81, 110 So. 96), whereby plaintiff is seeking to try anew the issues disposed of in that suit.
As to whether or not the appeal is frivolous, and is taken merely for the purpose of harassing the appellee and of delaying the execution of a judgment, necessarily involves *885 an inquiry into the facts and merits of the case. Where a motion to dismiss is based upon grounds requiring such an inquiry, the motion will be denied, and the appeal will be heard regularly upon its merits. Baker v. Frellsen, 32 La. Ann. 822; Thomas v. Guilbeau, 35 La. Ann. 927; Pasley v. McConnell, 39 La. Ann. 1097, 3 So. 484, 485; Drewes & Co. v. Ham & Seymour, 157 La. 861, 103 So. 241; John Barkley & Co., Limited, v. Ham & Seymour, 157 La. 872, 103 So. 245; Succession of Damico, 161 La. 725, 109 So. 402; Succession of Pavelka, 161 La. 728, 109 So. 403.
The motion to dismiss is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 So. 70, 166 La. 883, 1927 La. LEXIS 1908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/typhoon-fan-co-v-pilsbury-la-1927.