Baker v. Frellsen

32 La. Ann. 822
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 15, 1880
DocketNo. 980
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 32 La. Ann. 822 (Baker v. Frellsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Frellsen, 32 La. Ann. 822 (La. 1880).

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss.

Bermudez, C. J.

The plaintiff, Baker, having, in aid of a suit previously instituted, obtained an injunction to arrest a suit against him, furnished the bond required, with John T. Ludeling as surety therein.

Parties plaintiff and defendant being desirous of having the suit determined, agreed that it could be heard and decided, at chambers, after the adjournment of the court and term time.

The document signed to that effect was noted on the minutes. It was not signed by the surety on the bond for the injunction.

In furtherance of the agreement, the case was taken up, decided, and the judgment was signed by a judge ad hoc at chambers, without any knowledge or participation on the part of the surety.

The judgment was, that the injunction be dissolved without damages. From this judgment an appeal was taken by petition, and citation was served on the surety on the injunction bond. He now moves this Court to dismiss the appeal, because he was no party to the consent that the [825]*825¡ease be tried at chambers, and is not bound by the judgment so rendered.

0£ whatever relief the irregularities charged may be to the surety, they cannot be inquired into on a motion to dismiss, as they necessitate ■an investigation into the facts of the case as presented by the appeal. Tlie validity of those objections will be tested and passed upon when the merits of the case will be considered and determined.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rex Finance Company v. Cary
145 So. 2d 672 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)
Talbert v. Bounds & Allen
123 So. 2d 815 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)
Bruton v. Traders & General Insurance
111 So. 2d 816 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1959)
Woods v. William Rednour Transfer Storage Co.
3 So. 2d 213 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1941)
Basso v. Export Warrant Co.
193 So. 654 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1940)
Hunter v. Sandel
160 So. 87 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1935)
Gottlieb v. Avery Realty Co.
157 So. 369 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1934)
Alliance Trust Co. v. Streater
157 So. 726 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1934)
Nicholas v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
152 So. 779 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)
Price v. Town of Ruston
148 So. 512 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1933)
John Wanamaker New York, Inc. v. Comfort
53 F.2d 751 (Fifth Circuit, 1931)
Ducre v. Milner
126 So. 72 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1930)
American Multigraph Sales Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.
123 So. 358 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1929)
Petty v. Jones
121 So. 372 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1929)
Wilson v. Lyon Lumber Co.
7 La. App. 169 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
Typhoon Fan Co. v. Pilsbury
118 So. 70 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
Ducros v. St. Bernard Cypress Co.
114 So. 654 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
Succession of Pavelka
109 So. 403 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)
Keen Woolf v. Caldwell
108 So. 318 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)
John Barkley & Co. v. Ham & Seymour
103 So. 245 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 La. Ann. 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-frellsen-la-1880.