Tyler v. District of Columbia Housing Authority

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tyler v. District of Columbia Housing Authority. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 F. Supp. 3d 88
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided February 24, 2014·No. Civil Action No. 2014-0362·Published

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

JAMES TYLER * Plaintiff,

v. * CIVIL ACTION NO. DKC-14-453

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING * AUTHORITY Defendant. *

*****

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 18, 2014, Plaintiff filed this action for unlawful employment practices by Defendant in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. The Complaint was accompanied by a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. For reasons to follow, the Complaint shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A decision on the indigency motion shall be stayed and left for review by the transferee court.

This case has no connection to the State of Maryland, with the exception of Plaintiff’s Hyattsville, Maryland residence. Defendant is located in and all alleged illegal workplace actions occurred in the District of Columbia. Venue for ADEA actions is governed by the general venue provision of § 1391 of Title 28 of the United States Code. In particular, an action under the ADEA may be brought in a judicial district where “any defendant resides” or where “a substantial part of the events ... giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Because Defendant is a District of Columbia agency and the alleged workplace discrimination occurred in that District, Plaintiff's ADEA claims are properly brought in the District of Columbia.

When a case is filed in an improper venue, 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) allows for transfer to the proper venue rather than dismissal so as to better serve the “interests of justice.” Based on the court’s finding of improper venue in the current action, transfer will be granted under § 1406(a). See Hipage Co., Inc. v. Access2Go, Inc., 589 F.Supp.2d 602, 611 (E. D. Va. 2008); Hackos v. Sparks, 378 F.Supp.2d 632, 634 (M.D. N.C. 2005). The case shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for all further proceedings. A separate Order follows.

Date: February 24, 2014 ___________/s/____________________ DEBORAH K. CHASANOW

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tyler v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, (D.D.C. 2014).

Tyler v. District of Columbia Housing Authority (Tyler v. District of Columbia Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Hipage Co., Inc. v. Access2Go, Inc.
589 F. Supp. 2d 602 (E.D. Virginia, 2008)
Hackos v. Sparks
378 F. Supp. 2d 632 (M.D. North Carolina, 2005)