Turner v. State

608 So. 2d 566, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12258, 1992 WL 338520
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 557 So. 2d 939
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 1992·No. No. 91-3589·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Turner raises two issues on appeal: (1) Whether the trial court erred in scoring victim injury under counts I and II as severe on the sentencing guidelines score-sheet; (2) whether the trial court erred in not deferring payment of appellant’s fine on each count in that appellant was indigent and unable to pay the fine. We find no merit in issue one, and find as to issue 2 that the appellant never requested that the trial court defer payment of the fine nor did he indicate an inability to pay the fine. The issue was, thus, not preserved for appellate review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. State, 608 So. 2d 566, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12258, 1992 WL 338520 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

608 So. 2d 566 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.