Turner v. State

557 So. 2d 242, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1309, 1990 WL 20129
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 557 So. 2d 939
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 7, 1990·No. No. 89-2258·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and briefs of the parties we are of the opinion that the trial court erred in denying the appellant’s motion to suppress cocaine seized as the result of an illegal detention, illegal because the stop was not supported by a founded suspicion, McCarthy v. State, 536 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); R.B. v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

REVERSED.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. State, 557 So. 2d 242, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1309, 1990 WL 20129 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

557 So. 2d 242 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCarthy v. State
536 So. 2d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
In the Interest of R.B. v. State
429 So. 2d 815 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)