Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Turner v. State

Turner v. State

593 So. 2d 309, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 515, 1992 WL 12308
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 29, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1239
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 593 So. 2d 309 (Turner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. State, 593 So. 2d 309, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 515, 1992 WL 12308 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects, except we reverse the sentence since the state concedes that the trial court imposed an improper sentence on Stanley M. Turner (Turner). Upon remand, the trial court shall resen-tence Turner within the guidelines and hold a hearing on the amount of restitution and costs. A hearing is necessary because the trial court’s order does not conform with its oral statement. See Philips v. State, 578 So.2d 40, 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horne v. State
593 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
593 So. 2d 309, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 515, 1992 WL 12308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.