Tuggle v. Wilson

60 So. 391, 179 Ala. 671, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 186
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 21, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 60 So. 391 (Tuggle v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tuggle v. Wilson, 60 So. 391, 179 Ala. 671, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 186 (Ala. 1912).

Opinion

MoCLELLAN, J.

What purports to be a bill of exceptions was “taken, approved, and filed” by the presiding judge on November 11,1911. The final judgment, appealed from, was entered June 9, 1911. Thére does not appear to have been a presentation of the bill to the presiding judge within 90 days after judgment entered, as the statute (Code § 3019) requires. — Edinburgh-American Land Mortgage Company v. Canterbury, 169 Ala. 444, 53 South. 823.

The minutes of this court show that the parties appeared by attorneys and submitted the appeal on motion to strike the bill and on the merits. The motion to strike the bill must therefore prevail, and the purported bill of exceptions is, hence, stricken. The bill being stricken, no basis for errors assigned remains.

The decree of the probate court must, on this record, stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corbin v. State
72 So. 505 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Owens v. State
66 So. 852 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1914)
State ex rel. Tate v. Powell
63 So. 542 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 So. 391, 179 Ala. 671, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tuggle-v-wilson-ala-1912.