Corbin v. State

72 So. 505, 15 Ala. App. 83, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 111
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Corbin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 Ala. App. 602
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1916·Published

Opinion

BROWN, J.

The judgment of conviction from which this appeal is prosecuted was rendered on October 8, 1915, and the bill of exceptions was not presented to the trial judge until January 8, 1916, more than 90 days from the rendition of the judgment. It is true that sentence was not pronounced against the defendant until the 6th day of November, 1915; but the date of the judgment of conviction governs in fixing the time within which a bill of exceptions must be presented, and the motion of the Attorney General to strike the bill of exceptions in this case is granted. — Harper v. State, 13 Ala. App. 47, 69 South. 302; McGay v. State, 183 Ala. 41, 63 South. 70; McOllister v. State, 183 Ala. 8, 62 South. 767; Tuggle v. Wilson, 179 Ala. 671, 60 South. 391.

The proceedings of the trial court as shown by the record proper appear regular and free from error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Corbin v. State, 72 So. 505, 15 Ala. App. 83, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 111 (Ala. Ct. App. 1916).

72 So. 505 (Corbin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harper v. State
69 So. 302 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Tuggle v. Wilson
60 So. 391 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1912)
McOllister v. State
62 So. 767 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1913)
McGay v. State
63 So. 70 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1913)