Owens v. State

66 So. 852, 11 Ala. App. 309, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 71
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 24, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 66 So. 852 (Owens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owens v. State, 66 So. 852, 11 Ala. App. 309, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 71 (Ala. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

BROWN, J.

This case was submitted on the motion of the Attorney General to strike the bill of exceptions and on the merits.

The bill of exceptions is nothing more than a catechismal stenographic report of the trial, embodying the testimony of the witnesses and the remarks of counsel and of the court, in patent violation of rule 32 of circuit court practice. — Civil Code 1907, p. 1526; Hester v. Cantrell, 169 Ala. 490, 53 South. 1009.

[310]*310In addition to this, as a canse for striking the bill of exceptions, it was not presented to the trial judge within 90 days from the rendition of the judgment.- — Code 1907, 3019; Tuggle v. Wilson, 179 Ala. 671, 60 South. 391.

The motion to strike the bill of exceptions is granted, and, there being no error apparent upon the record, the judgment of the city court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. H. Arnold & Co. v. Pinckard & Lay
80 So. 164 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1918)
Turner v. Thornton
68 So. 813 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Clancy v. Taylor
68 So. 522 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 So. 852, 11 Ala. App. 309, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-state-alactapp-1914.