Hester v. Cantrell
This text of 53 So. 1009 (Hester v. Cantrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bill of exceptions expressly purports to he, as it is, nothing other than the steno[491]*491graphic report of the trial below. It is, hence, constructed. in patent violation of rule 32 of circuit court practice (Civ. Code 1907, p. 1526). It will be stricken. —Gassenheimer & Co. v. Marietta Co., 127 Ala. 183, 28 South. 564; Sou. Ry. Co. v. Jackson, 133 Ala. 384, 31 South. 988; Woodward Iron Co. v. Herndon, 130 Ala. 364, 375, 376, 30 South. 370.
There is no error assigned as upon the record proper, so the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 So. 1009, 169 Ala. 490, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hester-v-cantrell-ala-1910.