Hester v. Cantrell

53 So. 1009, 169 Ala. 490, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 231
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 1, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 53 So. 1009 (Hester v. Cantrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hester v. Cantrell, 53 So. 1009, 169 Ala. 490, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 231 (Ala. 1910).

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.

The bill of exceptions expressly purports to he, as it is, nothing other than the steno[491]*491graphic report of the trial below. It is, hence, constructed. in patent violation of rule 32 of circuit court practice (Civ. Code 1907, p. 1526). It will be stricken. —Gassenheimer & Co. v. Marietta Co., 127 Ala. 183, 28 South. 564; Sou. Ry. Co. v. Jackson, 133 Ala. 384, 31 South. 988; Woodward Iron Co. v. Herndon, 130 Ala. 364, 375, 376, 30 South. 370.

There is no error assigned as upon the record proper, so the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and Simpson and Mayfield, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collins v. Vaughn Realty Co.
117 So. 55 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
J. H. Arnold & Co. v. Pinckard & Lay
80 So. 164 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1918)
Turner v. Thornton
68 So. 813 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Clancy v. Taylor
68 So. 522 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Owens v. State
66 So. 852 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1914)
Higdon v. Warrant Warehouse Co.
63 So. 938 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Irby v. Kaigler
60 So. 418 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Lucas v. Mays
56 So. 593 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 So. 1009, 169 Ala. 490, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hester-v-cantrell-ala-1910.