Tucker v. State
790 So. 2d 442, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454, 2000 WL 296523
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tucker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 754 So. 2d 89 →
Opinion
Appellant was sentenced as a prison re-leasee reoffender, and he has raised two arguments that the Prison Releasee Reof-fender Punishment Act, section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997), is unconstitutional. We have previously addressed both of these challenges and found them each to be without merit. See Chambers v. State, [443]*443752 So.2d 64(Fla. 1st DCA 2000). However, we certify the same question previously certified in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla.1999).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tucker v. State, 790 So. 2d 442, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454, 2000 WL 296523 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
790 So. 2d 442 (Tucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chambers v. State
752 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Woods v. State
740 So. 2d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)