Tucker v. State

738 So. 2d 483, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10428, 1999 WL 560745
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 1999
DocketNo. 99-301
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 738 So. 2d 483 (Tucker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tucker v. State, 738 So. 2d 483, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10428, 1999 WL 560745 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brian Tucker (Tucker) seeks review of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial judge correctly denied Tucker’s motion on the merits.

We also treat the instant motion as a petition for a belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j), and grant the motion. See State [484]*484v. Trowell, 24 Fla. L. Weekly S235, 739 So.2d 77 (Fla.1999).

ERVIN, LAWRENCE and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sury v. State
750 So. 2d 152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
738 So. 2d 483, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10428, 1999 WL 560745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.