Tucker v. State

724 So. 2d 139, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15050, 1998 WL 830659
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 2, 1998·No. No. 97-04474·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THREADGILL, Acting Chief Judge.

Herman Tucker appeals a sentence imposed upon resentencing after appeal. He claims the sentence was erroneously enhanced by a law enforcement protection multiplier, which was included on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet pursuant to section 921.0014(1), Florida Statutes (1995). The State concedes that the law enforcement protection multiplier was improperly applied in this case. Tucker failed to first raise this issue in the trial court as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(d). We, therefore, affirm without prejudice to Tucker to file a motion to correct his sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

BLUE and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. State, 724 So. 2d 139, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15050, 1998 WL 830659 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

724 So. 2d 139 (Tucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaines v. State
724 So. 2d 139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)