Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Trotman v. Spell

Trotman v. Spell

259 S.E.2d 490, 151 Ga. App. 241, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2514
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 6, 1979·No. 58264·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a default. Thus, the cause is still pending in the court below and, there being no compliance with provisions for an interlocutory appeal under Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 2 (Ga. [242] L. 1965, p. 18; as amended through Ga. L. 1975, pp. 757, 758), the appeal is premature. Mayson v. Malone, 122 Ga. App. 814 (178 SE2d 806); Thigpen v. Futura Const., Inc. 140 Ga. App. 65 (230 SE2d 92); White v. Complete Auto Transit, 146 Ga. App. 132 (245 SE2d 472).

Submitted July 10, 1979 Decided September 6, 1979. Murray M. Silver, for appellant. Phillip R. Taylor, Thomas F. Richardson, for appellees.

Appeal dismissed.

Smith and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trotman v. Spell, 259 S.E.2d 490, 151 Ga. App. 241, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2514 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

259 S.E.2d 490 (Trotman v. Spell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayson v. Malone
178 S.E.2d 806 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Thigpen v. Futura Construction, Inc.
230 S.E.2d 92 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
White v. Complete Auto Transit, Inc.
245 S.E.2d 472 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)