Thigpen v. Futura Construction, Inc.

230 S.E.2d 92, 140 Ga. App. 65, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1347
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 20, 1976·No. 52841·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

This is an appeal from the grant of a motion to set aside a judgment and open a default leaving the case pending below. There is no certificate for immediate review from the trial judge nor compliance with Section 1 of the Act of 1975 (Ga. L. 1975, pp. 757, 758; Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 2) requiring a petition to the appellate court for allowance of the appeal and the appeal, being thus premature, is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur. Glenn Howell, for appellant. Rees R. Smith, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thigpen v. Futura Construction, Inc., 230 S.E.2d 92, 140 Ga. App. 65, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1347 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

230 S.E.2d 92 (Thigpen v. Futura Construction, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trotman v. Spell
259 S.E.2d 490 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)