Thigpen v. Futura Construction, Inc.

230 S.E.2d 92, 140 Ga. App. 65, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1347
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 20, 1976
Docket52841
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 S.E.2d 92 (Thigpen v. Futura Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thigpen v. Futura Construction, Inc., 230 S.E.2d 92, 140 Ga. App. 65, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1347 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

This is an appeal from the grant of a motion to set aside a judgment and open a default leaving the case pending below. There is no certificate for immediate review from the trial judge nor compliance with Section 1 of the Act of 1975 (Ga. L. 1975, pp. 757, 758; Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 2) requiring a petition to the appellate court for allowance of the appeal and the appeal, being thus premature, is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur. Glenn Howell, for appellant. Rees R. Smith, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trotman v. Spell
259 S.E.2d 490 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 S.E.2d 92, 140 Ga. App. 65, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thigpen-v-futura-construction-inc-gactapp-1976.