Tronlone v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee

New York Court of Appeals

Tronlone v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee

790 N.E.2d 269, 99 N.Y.2d 647, 760 N.Y.S.2d 96, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 405

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 8, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by34 cases

This text of 790 N.E.2d 269 (Tronlone v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tronlone v. Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee, 790 N.E.2d 269, 99 N.Y.2d 647, 760 N.Y.S.2d 96, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 405 (N.Y. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

In this wrongful death action, plaintiff submitted sufficient proof in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment to create a triable issue of fact as to whether asbestos fibers manufactured by the defendant were supplied to decedent’s employer during his tenure there. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied under the relevant law of either New Jersey or New York.

*648 Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur in memorandum; Judge Read dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (297 AD2d 528, 529-531 [2002]).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI