Trinity Ambulance Service, Inc. v. G & L Ambulance Services, Inc.
787 F.2d 86
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 14, 1986·No. No. 838, Docket 85-7974·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Assuming arguendo that the contracts entered into by the City of Hartford would have violated the antitrust laws but for the “state action” exemption, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Cabranes in his opinion, 625 F.Supp. 142 (D. Conn.1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trinity Ambulance Service, Inc. v. G & L Ambulance Services, Inc., 787 F.2d 86 (2d Cir. 1986).
787 F.2d 86 (Trinity Ambulance Service, Inc. v. G & L Ambulance Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Trinity Ambulance Service, Inc. v. G & L Ambulance Services, Inc.
787 F.2d 86 (Second Circuit, 1986)