Transit Casualty Company v. Security Trust Company

396 F.2d 803
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 29, 1968·No. 25249·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellants brought this suit as a class action. Before the court reached a determination of appellants’ right to maintain this suit as a class action, the district judge ordered appellants to “amend their complaints so as to include ' as parties plaintiff all members of the alleged class who have retained counsel for the plaintiffs to represent them in these two cases.” Ten months later the district judge dismissed appellants’ suit with prejudice when appellants failed to comply with this order. Rule 41(b) F.R.Civ.P.

We agree with the order of dismissal by the district court, but vacate that part of the order making the dismissal with prejudice and remand with instructions to enter the order without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Transit Casualty Company v. Security Trust Company, 396 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1968).

396 F.2d 803 (Transit Casualty Company v. Security Trust Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riverwood Commercial Park, L.L.C. v. Standard Oil Co.
2007 ND 36 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2007)
Gonzales v. Witzke
2007 ND 34 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2007)
Home Savings Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
854 P.2d 851 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1993)
LaPrade v. Lehman
490 A.2d 1151 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1985)
Albert H. Carter v. Telectron, Inc.
554 F.2d 1369 (Fifth Circuit, 1977)
Berse v. Berman
60 F.R.D. 414 (S.D. New York, 1973)
Leslie Canada v. Elvie Mathews
449 F.2d 253 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
Transit Casualty Company v. Security Trust Company
399 F.2d 665 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)